Visit beevine's column >>

BEEVINEHome Page

Human Advocate
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 302
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 10/20/2009

Plan pushed for government to buy bank stocks

advertisement

With a new trading week dawning, U.S. lawmakers urged quick action by the Bush administration on measures to make direct purchases of bank stock to help unlock lending.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.2

Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":3452151,"authorDomain":"1450b"}

When you put idiots in charge of the asylem chaos is what you get. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank are at the center of this fiasco and I have yet to hear any Democrat say as much. There is plenty of blame to go around but it all comes back to pressuring Fannie Mae to guarantee loans to bums. The best solution to this mess is to let the market sort out the good from the bad and then insure that NO ONE who can't make a 20% down payment ever get a mortgage. The other thing is to send the CEOs of the failed wall street companies to prison for at least as long as it takes for their greedy behavior to be corrected.

{"commentId":3452151,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"1450b"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:09 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452165,"authorDomain":"nate-gram"}

And you think the republicans had nothing to do with this at all? ROTFLMFAO I think Phil Gramm has more to do with this mee than Frank or Dodd. Actually you can put most of the blame on Milton Friedman and the conservative morons who believe in an unregulated economy. Yes in a classroom economic model it may work but when you add humans (i.e. GREED) to the equation you get what we have everytime the Repubs are in charge for any length of time RECESSION OR DEPRESSION.

{"commentId":3452165,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"nate-gram"}
  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:11 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452185,"authorDomain":"martvol"}

You will never get the dems to admit to wrong doing. They lay it solely at the feet of Bush.  Here is the truth.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxgSubmiGt8

{"commentId":3452185,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"martvol"}
  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452241,"authorDomain":"nate-gram"}

so now youtube has all the answers? gee if that was the case why don't we let youtube run the country? You shouldn't believe everything you see on youtube? Try studying world economic history over the past 40 years and you will see that Milton Friedman is solely responsible (and those who follow his economic model)

{"commentId":3452241,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"nate-gram"}
  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452291,"authorDomain":"martvol"}
conservative morons who believe in an unregulated economy

If you watch that "youtube" piece you will see that it was not deregulation that caused this, but a regulation that bank loan to minorities and the poor. That is  the problem. There are some people that are not fit to own a home and the Government mandated that these people get loans. Watch the video. It is in there.

{"commentId":3452291,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"martvol"}
  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452338,"authorDomain":"nate-gram"}

I do not need to watch a youtube movie made by cons trying to cover their ass to know what made this mess. I have a Masters in Economics and have worked with many of the governments  around the world affected by Friedman Economics (reganomics as you may know it by)

{"commentId":3452338,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"nate-gram"}
  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452343,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

Hey Adam If you had any sense at all you could read what worky wrote, he said blame was everyones including republicans.  The democrats are more responsible esp Barney Frank and Dodds, even the great Pelosi is right there too.  Even the 3 crooked senatore running for office are involved.  The blame is on all of them and they all need replaced.  If  you are to  dense to see this then stay in your little box and live in your little make believe land.  You fit right in with the democrats and the state of denial they are all in.  Before you cry I am a republican you are wrong I am an independant as of last month before that I was a democrat for the last 28 years.  But I do have my own mind and I can see the real actions of the ones there.

{"commentId":3452343,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452414,"authorDomain":"logdump"}

How stupid to say Barney Frank and Chris Dodd had anything to do with something that started in 2003

{"commentId":3452414,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"logdump"}
  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
{"commentId":3452538,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

Here is another example of a smart american with no ability to think on there own.    Do you think they just popped on the scene, Barney Frank and Chris Dodds have been around forever and dirtier than anyone in congress.  Do you remember Barney Franks using his power to make male pledges have sex with him.  Check out Franks dealings with Fannie Mae you are a bigger idiot than I thought could be alive if you can't see the democrats involvement with this.  You give the regular democrats defense DENY, DENY, DENY, bit you will see tomorrow or later on this week when they want to take more of your it will be 150 billion dollars for each state they want to give now, but if you have no problem with that then just stay hidden in your little box

{"commentId":3452538,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
    #1.8 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3452541,"authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}

    Logdump-

    It started during the Carter administration,  was exacerbated during the Clinton administration, and was ignored during the last decade with a lot of dem help.  I'm not saying the repubs a guiltless but the lion share of the problem can definitely laid at the feet of the dems.  

    Get your head out of your ass and do some real research.

    {"commentId":3452541,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.9 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3452624,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

    The democrats cannot accept these things.  They believe up until this year it was only republicans running the country.  They refuse toaccept the facts the democrats had votes in both the hosue and senate.  They don't realize the President needs the votes from the house and the senate before any bills go through.  The democrats believe the President can say soemthing and it gets done right then.  They think if Obama gets in it be be one week and everything will be changed,  well people wake up it doesn't work that way.

    {"commentId":3452624,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
      #1.10 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:00 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3452826,"authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}

      scarab333

      Logdump-

      It started during the Carter administration,  was exacerbated during the Clinton administration, and was ignored during the last decade with a lot of dem help.  I'm not saying the repubs a guiltless but the lion share of the problem can definitely laid at the feet of the dems.  

      Get your head out of your ass and do some real research.

      Are you that ignorant ? Only a fool would make such an idiotic statement and think that anyone with at least a kindergarten education would believe your stupid lie.

      Anyone with an I.Q. of 60 knows it falls directly on Reagan' policies of DEREGULATION. And continued with Bush Sr. & his dumb offspring, George Jr.

      But, you already knew that, but you and the other simpletons defending Bush / McCain think you can trick the feeble minded into believing your party' lies.

      Take some advice, you can NOT fool people with stupidity, even McBush knows that.

      {"commentId":3452826,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}
      • 1 vote
      #1.11 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:18 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3452869,"authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}

      Instead of only blaming the CEO's why not put the blame squarely where it belongs, on the current BUSH administration. This fiasco didn't happen overnight, it has been building for a while now, and hidden by BUSH & Co. It did not start because of Freddie and Fannie, they're only a part of the problem. This has happened because of deregulation, pushed by people like McCain and other Republicans promoting the Reagan policies of trickle down econonomics. I think that means when the RICH pee it is supposed to trickle down on us. This whole 'experiment' has been a disaster on America.  
       
      REAGAN and DEREGULATION
       
      While much of the blame for this mess goes back to Republicans of the past, this current situation goes back to Ronald Reagan. He started this country on the road to ruin with his policies, especially deregulation, making some people rich and fooling people that the rich would make the country grow. After all, the rich are the people who invest and make jobs grow, right.
       
      The truth is since his presidency, we now have 6 million millionaires. Many of the good jobs have gone overseas. Many others are no longer good jobs because of being filled by illegal aliens that he gave a free pass to. Our children now earn less than we did. CEO's are paid obscene salaries for losing money and outsourcing jobs. This financial experiment has been a TOTAL failure for average people and a financial windfall for the rich. When will it end. With the exception of Bill Clinton who gave us a surplus, America has been run to the ground by Republican administrations since 1980. Had enough, end this insane experiment of "voodoo" economics.
       
      While some blame goes to the Democrats, much more goes to the Republicans.
       
      Before this mess is over, it will cost us Gazillions. ( There is no name yet for what this will add up to ). This BAILOUT is just the tip of the iceberg, and the name of our ship is Titanic.
       
      This is UNACCEPTABLE.

      {"commentId":3452869,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}
      • 3 votes
      #1.12 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:22 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3452883,"authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}

      who da thunk, George Bush could have destroyed the constitution and the Bill Of Rights, destroyed the environment, the economy, restarted the cold war, pissed off more countries and allies than any other world leader at 1 time, started 2 useless wars, divided America more than at any other time in history including the Civil War, devastated the National debt and budget, and now he is destroying Capitalism, ---- WOW even the USSR couldn't have done that.
       
      Way to go Bushie, you're doin a heck of a job. 
       
      Make sure you vote for McCain and continue this INSANITY. Instead of talking about and discussing the economy, he is talking about the Weather Underground, what a fruitcake. Clearly, he has NO plan, or ability to comprehend this mess. Send him to retirement, he is done.

      {"commentId":3452883,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}
      • 2 votes
      #1.13 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3452890,"authorDomain":"dpaddock"}

      You said it Adam was a black man greed was the whole cause of this and how do you put a check on greed with out regulation. You let them fall flat on their asses and go broke that way they will never do it again. But nope not use lets bail them out so to do so mean we must have regulation.

       Oh and Adam was all colors it stands for man kind and if it was one man he was more indian, what eve it sure wasn't white.

      {"commentId":3452890,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"dpaddock"}
      • 2 votes
      #1.14 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3452990,"authorDomain":"stopthenwonow"}

      The US financial system needs to clean house.

      LET THE INSOLVENT BANKS GO BANKRUPT.  You do not NEED a bank to live your life. Simply live your life debt free and you will never have to worry.

      {"commentId":3452990,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"stopthenwonow"}
      • 3 votes
      #1.15 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:34 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3454011,"authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}

       "On Friday afternoon - 3:13 Eastern - (The Dow) jumped from approx. 8,100 to almost 8,900 in 40 minutes - with this volume this is a minimum of a $1 Trillion dollar movement. Now who in the world on a Friday afternoon is going to buy so Bullishly into a massive Bear Runaway - who has this kind of money? Then within 20 minutes the market then again backs off to 8,3000 - Wow - Double Wow!

      My belief, and the belief of almost every market watcher i know is that the Plunge Protection Team dumped another $1 Trillion of our money (actually debt credits) - and all of this (our) money went straight to 'Money Heaven' - bye, bye!
          

      So obvious a blind man could see it - yet - not one word from the media."

      {"commentId":3454011,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}
        #1.16 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:09 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3454422,"authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}

        It makes much more sense to buy stock than to buy bad mortgages. It should be done by buying short term Preferred Stock with a phase out term. This will provide the liquidity needed because for every $Billion in stock, the bank can lend $10-12 Billion in new loans because of the low reserve requirements. By buying Preferred Stock, the final cost of the bad sub-prime mortgages should remain with the regular stock holders - where it belongs. Preferred Stock holders get their money back before any regular stockholders get anything.

        {"commentId":3454422,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}
          #1.17 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:47 PM EDT
          {"commentId":3456305,"authorDomain":"bohdansz"}

          The  time  is  chaotic.  Blame  is  widely  spread out. For  me  the  blame  includes  the  Supreme  Court's  misguided  prohibition  that  the  states  defend  themselves  from  bad  mortgage  lending!  Judge  Ruth Bader  Ginsburg's  decision  in  this  respect  came  as  early  as  April 2007. In retrospective, was her decision on Roe v. Wade any better? No way! It was America's killer number one, the number two being the current mortgage crisis! Why  no  one  talks  about  it? Sen. Arlen  Specter is  also  flaundering  in  ruling  out  what  is  good  in  other  political  systems.  We  should  by  all  means put  some  controls  similar  to  the  Chinese!  All  that  is  good,  serves  Capitalism,  Messers.  Senators  and  Representatives!

          {"commentId":3456305,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"bohdansz"}
            #1.18 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:47 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3456508,"authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}

            <!-- @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->

            Obama may well win, but most people don't know what they're getting. For example, he has voted against extending the Bush tax cuts – even for the middle class, which expire in 2010. This means -for families with taxable income of:

            $17,000 - increased taxes of $400

            $29,000 - increased taxes of $1,100

            $72,000 - increased taxes of $2,300

            $251,000 - increased taxes of $6,900

            Source - www.smartmoney.com/tax

            When he says that people making under $250,000 won't see a tax increase, he means no increase above the scheduled increase at the end of 2010. And if you have anything that sells at a profit (capital gains), there will be more taxes on that as well. McCain voted to make these tax cuts permanent, but the Democrats in Congress voted against it. Watch your wallets when Obama gets in and he has control of Congress.

            {"commentId":3456508,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}
              #1.19 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:22 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3456821,"authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}

              ROY WILSON-336103

              Obama may well win, but most people don't know what they're getting.

              No Roy, we know what we are getting.

              We are not getting 4 more years of the same failed Bush policies.

              We are getting someone who has a grasp on the financial mess that was created by failed Republican policies.

              We are getting someone who talks about the issues, and has ideas about fixing them.

              Not a buffoon who is talking about the Vietnam War and The Weather Underground.

              Nice try but you lose again.

              {"commentId":3456821,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"yellowknife-street-railway"}
              • 1 vote
              #1.20 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:29 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3457674,"authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}

              You are the typical Obot, White Bear.   You just hate the republicans so you don't want to see the truth. Everything I said is easily verifiable but you choose to just believe everyone is lying to you.   You are the type of voters the founding fathers were terrified of and today's politicians count on...the uninformed voter.

              {"commentId":3457674,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}
              • 1 vote
              #1.21 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:27 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3458340,"authorDomain":"martvol"}

              There are people that should not have been able to get a loan. They could not aford to repay it.  REGULATIONS that required lender to give these people loans is the problem. Regulations that Obama fought to inforce (ACORN) and still embraces caused this. He is not the answer. He is the problem.

               http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxgSubmiGt8

              {"commentId":3458340,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"martvol"}
                #1.22 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 AM EDT
                {"commentId":3459663,"authorDomain":"widemoto"}

                Roy,

                I'd like to think that the banks will be stupid enough to sell preferred stocks, the last I know of it'll be crap stocks which would not benefit the taxpayer in terms of a logical investment in a failing institution. What's in it for us except further inflation and more taxes.

                We give banks more capital to operate with and they give us much higher interest rates on loans than the 1.5% interest rate on their loans from the central bank, real nice deal being shafted again.

                {"commentId":3459663,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"widemoto"}
                  #1.23 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":3452155,"authorDomain":"nate-gram"}

                  Notice the sh_t eating grins on the 3 crooks in the photo? I guess I would be smiling too if I just stole 700 billion dollars from soon to be poor people.

                  {"commentId":3452155,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"nate-gram"}
                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:10 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":3452437,"authorDomain":"logdump"}

                  You just stole my line. LOL Why are these idiots smiling?

                  {"commentId":3452437,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"logdump"}
                    #2.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:40 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":3452497,"authorDomain":"logdump"}

                    First thing congress should do is pass a regulation on Banks and lending institutions that is so strict it makes their jewels shrivel up every time they go to make a loan. They send out their trolls to point you to a worthless video on utube when the real answer is right in fromt of your nose. It was unregulated credit swaps.

                    BTW the banking industry worldwide is suffering. Did Barney Frank and Chriss Dodd have something to do with that also.

                    Want to watch a real video on how this happened. go here

                    http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4502673n?source=mostpop_video

                    {"commentId":3452497,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"logdump"}
                      #2.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":3452559,"authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}

                      They are smiling because you just gave the keys to the sheep pens to the wolves.

                      {"commentId":3452559,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scarabsoftware"}
                        #2.3 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:54 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":3453150,"authorDomain":"wilberta"}

                        Adam_was_a_Black_Man

                        ....The three stooges.....Moe...Larry...Curly....Shemp...take your pick...comedy of errors

                        except they are laughing and the CITIZENS are crying....some thing is wrong with

                        that picture...should be OTHER WAY AROUND...THEY SHOULD BE IN TEARS

                        {"commentId":3453150,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"wilberta"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #2.4 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:51 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":3455315,"authorDomain":"cj-134"}

                        You can bet posting that picture with this article was done on purpose. It fits it well.

                        {"commentId":3455315,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"cj-134"}
                          #2.5 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:20 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":3459707,"authorDomain":"widemoto"}

                          They're smiling because a just had a real nice session with Barney Frank on backend strategies.

                          {"commentId":3459707,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"widemoto"}
                            #2.6 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:01 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":3452203,"authorDomain":"georgemcclelland"}

                            Why doesn't Congress pass a bill that states that all US stocks purchased in the 4th quarter will be exempt from capital gains tax when sold. Can you imagine what this would do for the stock market.  The intake to the national treasury is more determined by the creation of wealth by its citizens and not the absolute tax scales. This would work much better than just sending out random checks to the population.  Also, they need to create tax incentives to encourage Americans to save other than for retirement.

                            {"commentId":3452203,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"georgemcclelland"}
                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#3 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":3452321,"authorDomain":"martvol"}

                             Also, they need to create tax incentives to encourage Americans to save other than for retirement.

                            They could just raise the interest rates for that. Those who still have money would put money in the bank. The banks would have money to work with. Yes, loans would cost more, but there would be less frivolous loans out.

                            {"commentId":3452321,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"martvol"}
                            • 4 votes
                            #3.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":3452207,"authorDomain":"patb-1"}

                            I guess since they took all our money the only thing left to steal is the rest of the money left in the bank. I vote the Bush wacked administration the biggest thieves the world has ever seen. No wonder they are " All smiles"

                            {"commentId":3452207,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"patb-1"}
                            • 5 votes
                            Reply#4 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":3452396,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

                            Right it was Bush who took the money, did you not notice it was the house which is run by democrats on television trying to rush this bailout bill through, and they were crying when the republicans voted the first one down.  Take a look at who the pushers were, lets see if you can accept it, it  was Franks, Dodds, Pelosi, all of who chaired and set on the finance committee who were supposed to be overseeing the wall street crooks.  They did a great job esp since franks new boyfriend is a top exec at fannie mae, and Dodds was giving a special mortgage from countrywide.  That sounds like they were in more than they should have been.  As a democrat I am ashamed to say they represent my party, so I switched to independant.

                            {"commentId":3452396,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #4.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:35 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":3454095,"authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}

                            Check out C-Span of California Rep. Brad Sherman on the house floor discussing the bill and the pressure that was put on 'several members' to hurry up and pass this bill OR ELSE! Ca. Rep Brad Sherman and Martial Law.  Wake up America, the world is watching what we as citizens are going to do as far as who is going to run this country.

                            {"commentId":3454095,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}
                              #4.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:18 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":3456371,"authorDomain":"bohdansz"}

                              What  no  one  is  commenting  upon  is  whether  our  10  trillion  national  debt  is  in  stocks  or  in  hard  cash. The question is: are world stocks secured by governments, or not. If not, to say that in-stocks debt is secured is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms!   If  in  stocks,  the  debt  may  itself  has  fallen  victim  of  this  crisis.  This  may  be  the  reason  why  our  trio  is  smiling ... while  the  debt  holders  are  so  serious!

                              {"commentId":3456371,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"bohdansz"}
                                #4.3 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:14 AM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":3452331,"authorDomain":"magineer02"}

                                I totally agree with Pat, these people have no conscience whatsoever.

                                {"commentId":3452331,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"magineer02"}
                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#5 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:29 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":3452416,"authorDomain":"carlrite"}

                                These are what is being passed off as monetary guru's. That was the obvious thing from the get go, refinance the banks with cash and take preferred stock in the company--held by anyone other than the nitwits/crooks running the shop.

                                Further, the banks themselves would still be responsible for the fraud they have put on their own books and have to care for. If they go under-T.S.

                                {"commentId":3452416,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"carlrite"}
                                  Reply#6 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":3452425,"authorDomain":"billewald"}

                                  Money should only go the banks that are solid.  Banks like BofA, Chase, Citi and a few others that have come forth and tried to help this mess by buying the poorly run banks.  NO money should go to likes of IndyMac, Washington Mutual, and many others that have proven to have unsound business practices.  Let them go out of business.  Same for Mortgage Companies and investment companies that have proven to be poorly run.  Let the cream rise to the top and the junk fall by the way side.  IT WILL COST US LESS.

                                  {"commentId":3452425,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billewald"}
                                    Reply#7 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:39 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452565,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

                                    The money shouldn't go anywhere until they get the crooks out of congress and the senate and keep their hands out of it.  Everyone from each side should be held responsible for their votes and investigated as to how far in they are to the wall street boys.  Then they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

                                    {"commentId":3452565,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #7.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:54 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452667,"authorDomain":"patb-1"}

                                    "They" is you and me, my friend. You want a new government?? Vote them ALL out. Put away your party politics and when you are in the booth VOTE OUT INCUMBENTS. Contact your representatives before hand and tell them why. Eventuall they will get the picture. Do our bidding or you are GONE!

                                    {"commentId":3452667,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"patb-1"}
                                    • 3 votes
                                    #7.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:04 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":3452477,"authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}

                                    Notice the change in plan?  First of all it was "This has to be done immediately, this 700 billion bailout bill has to be passed today".  Well it was passed and time has passed and no one seems in a big rush all of a sudden any more.  But even more disturbing is the change in the spending of the money.  It was originally allocated to buy up bad mortgages from failing banks letting them get back on their feet and be able to start lending again.  Have Fannie and Freddie hold the mortgages and resell them when a profit could be made (and they installed a CEO of Fannie and Freddie to do this at a salary of $999,000.00 per year. so we know where the first billion went)  so much for regulating CEO salaries.    Now all of a sudden instead of purchasing the bad debt, they are going to use the funds to buy into the banks themselves (which was more likely the plan all along since the clause in the bill which gives them the power to do this was supposedly hidden in an obscure corner of the bill and congress did not realize it, yeah, right.  Welcome to China on the mainland.

                                    {"commentId":3452477,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#8 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452485,"authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}

                                    Tomorrow the great Barney Franks, Pelosi, and Dodds are going to announce an emergency meeting in the house, because now they want to approve taking another $150 billion dollars of the taxpayers money to give each state.  Lets see how the 3 great Senators we have running for president will vote for this.  I haven't made up my mind yet as to who to vote, neither party has a candidate that should be in office.  They are all crooked and should not even be where they are.  But I guess when you have an open job that smart people wouldn't take you get the bottom of the barrell, and believe me they are all from the bottom.  You democrats can cry and say Obama is a god, but you may be surprised to learn he isn't, it has only taken him 2 years to break so many ethical laws and rules he fits right with  Biden, and McCain they have been around so long now we know all about them, neither one of them are going to try hard to change anything. 

                                    {"commentId":3452485,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"terrill-ny"}
                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#9 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452506,"authorDomain":"scleslie"}

                                    "Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., sounded a cautionary note. “That has to be very, very carefully done,” he said. “We are a capitalistic system and we don’t want to move away with nationalizing the banking system. So that anything that’s done has to be done on a temporary basis.”"

                                    Uh we have not been Capitalistic since the sell of Bear Sterns backed by federal dollars and the stake bought into AIG. Pull your head out Specter you waste of a vote.

                                    Watch these clowns beat down the second stimulous package because its just too expensive.

                                    I believe our constitution that these congressional leaders pass around for toilet paper does not allow our government to own stock in a private company. Our current leaders are hi-jacking our country. Vote opposite every single one of these cretins and send them packing.

                                    {"commentId":3452506,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scleslie"}
                                    • 4 votes
                                    Reply#10 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:49 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452698,"authorDomain":"patb-1"}

                                    Done!

                                    {"commentId":3452698,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"patb-1"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    #10.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:06 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":3452544,"authorDomain":"annoyed"}

                                    Paragraph 1.  protectionism is just what we need as evidenced by the current state of the economy. A lack of protectionism is what has caused this mess.
                                    Paragraph 2. Someone please tell me how buying stock in defunct banks relates to unlocking cash flow. Stock prices may go up, but it does nothing for the p/e. This is the next step to nationalize the banks and a full blown take over of the monetary system.
                                    Paragraph 3. Explains it all. The investors, no doubt foreign have to be protected from further lose. to bad for them, they should take their marbles and go home.
                                    Paragraph 4. Another sneaky scam to try and push thru to help who? The first $700 was for that and the public will not benefit from this one either.
                                    Paragraph 5.  Nancy Pelosi's plan: Another handout, food stamps and unemployment, so typical of the way she thinks. Hay Nancy, ever heard of the thing called an honest days work for an honest day's pay? 
                                    Paragraph 6. Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri,  a voice of reason?
                                    Paragraph 7. In another step aimed at easing the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve on Sunday approved the $12.2 billion acquisition of troubled Wachovia Corp. by Wells Fargo & Co. Wachovia is the latest in a string of major banks and financial institutions that have been felled by the financial crisis. The Fed action was expected. So where is the other Billions dollars. the purchse price for Wachovia by Wells Fargo on Oct. 3. was 15. 1 billion dollars.
                                    I thought this was interesting too:Paulson has indicated the administration will use part of the recent $700 billion bailout Bush signed Oct. 3 to have the government take ownership stakes in banks. The plan has wide support on Capitol Hill, although Democrats pressed for quicker action in spelling out specifics. King Hank surely will be King. All of this  money was for the banking system, period. What do you think his intent is for the rest of the money. Crooks, all of them. And now they intend to try this tact again. We are in trouble here foklks.

                                    {"commentId":3452544,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"annoyed"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#11 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452628,"authorDomain":"scleslie"}

                                    Well said, they pushed a bill that the amercian people said clearly "No" to, as money to buy bad morgage assets from the ailing banks and place them under Freddie and Fannie. Then hopefully they could minimize the amount of loss if possible and also allowing the banks to use the money from the purchase to loan back out and free up credit in the market.

                                    Now that its passed, they plan to use part of it to buy into the banks themselves which was never mentioned by any of them. Our govenment is not to own parts of private companies period.

                                    {"commentId":3452628,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scleslie"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    #11.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":3452636,"authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}

                                    Glad to see someone else sees the big picture here.

                                    {"commentId":3452636,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}
                                      #11.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:02 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":3452714,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                      When the ox is in the ditch the priority has to be how to get it out. 

                                      The problem is that the money has already been authorized and is going to be spent.  As is see it now  ......  what can we do to make sure that the bail out does not become a windfall bone to the shareholders and management of failing banks.To avoid more situations as recently occurred with AIG and its party junket

                                      I suggest that any bank receiving assistance from bail out  funds agree that it
                                      :

                                      1. give the treasury preferred shares with voting rights as to management and dividends
                                      2. agree not to pay any shareholder dividends until the preferred shares are bought back for a price which is the higher of the value of common at time of retirement or the amount which includes interest at the average Fed Funds rate for the period that the shares are outstanding
                                      3. agree that management will not receive any salaries in excess of those in effect 5 years ago adjusted for inflation and that no bonus compensation be paid or authorized until the shares are repurchased.
                                      4. require that the shares be repurchased in no longer than 5 years with an incentive for early  repurchase
                                      5. require sale of the bank or its assets to another bank which has met its requirements if the shares are not repurchased  in the allotted time

                                      I do not like doing a damn thing for the banks but if the banking system fails we are all going to be mess we will never recover from.  If the banks fail you better plan to plant a garden because that may be the only way you have to eat when your job shuts down.

                                      {"commentId":3452714,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                        Reply#12 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:08 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":3452724,"authorDomain":"usfreedomfighter"}

                                        Do not listen to our incompetent leaders. Let fall what cannot stand.

                                        And then let us, the people rebuild. We are the working backbone of America.

                                        Most of our tax dollars pays for our incompetent leadership and their overspending.

                                        Let us take charge together. What better opportunity than to vote for a third party president?  Do you realize what a signal of real change that would be? It didn't even have to be a specially talented president. When you look at what both Obama and McCain has to offer, I think you get the drift. What is important is that we, the people, get back into the game.

                                        Stop being a sheep. Take personal responsibility. Vote for your chosen third party presidential candidate. Instead of having to choose between the plague - or cholera.

                                        {"commentId":3452724,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"usfreedomfighter"}
                                          Reply#13 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":3452730,"authorDomain":"dmac225"}

                                          I just have to laugh watching people argue over whether the Democrats or Republicans are more responsible for the most recent WMD (Weapon of Mass Deception) our "leaders" have dropped on us. This was not caused or created by "Democrats" or "Republicans" but by members of BOTH parties who are either knowingly or are being manipulated into, creating a single global government. There is an easy way to know who is responsible for this (and many other) "disasters" and "crisis'". Just look at the membership lists of the Council on Foreign Relations (). Read the mission statements and goals of these organizations using standard definitions for the words. All three organizations try to spin their stated goals into harmless "we just want to be friendly and helpful to our neighbors" drivel. Like I said, read what their goals are. If they are successful the ONLY framework that will sustain their desired result is a single, global government.

                                          {"commentId":3452730,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"dmac225"}
                                            Reply#14 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:10 PM EDT
                                            {"commentId":3452749,"authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}

                                            Contacting so called representatives regarding issues via email is a waste of time.  All you get is generic answers.  One size fits all.

                                            {"commentId":3452749,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}
                                              Reply#15 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":3452757,"authorDomain":"seapro2007"}

                                              I had several rent houses,but I got out of the business because of HUD,claiming to sue me for discrimnation,because I wouldnt rent to a minority,because they didnt have the credit to buy a sack of hammers,but these people who beleive to put these people in these houses may have well broke this country,I know for a fact so dont anyone try to say diffrent,BEFORE Bill Clinton got into office,you couldnt get a home equity loan,but after his 3rd year in his first term,home equity loan were avaible in Texas,its just not bad sub-prime loans,there alot of home equity loan defaults also,IS WHY THIS IS SO DANGREOUS INVESTORS LIKE ME ARE NOT BUYING THESE SUB-PRIME,THERE IS TOO MUCH MONEY INTO THEM,BACK TAXES,NO MONEY DOWN AT CLOSING,NO MONEY AT CLOSING,THIS IS WHAT OUR GOVERMENT IS NOT TELLING YOU,I LOOK INTO BUYING SOME OF THESE SUB-PRIMES,MOST WERE AROUND 20 TO 30 THOUSAND DOLLARS IN BACK TAXES ECT.THIS IS SO SERIOUS,MACAIN,OBAMA,AND ALL THE THUGS IN WASHINGTON CANT FX THIS,A STIMULUS PACKAGE,CUTTING INTREST RATES,700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT,NOW CONGRESS IS TALKING ABOUT ANOTHER STIMULUS PACKAGE,AND OUR MARKETS ARE FAILING ALL OVER THE WORLD,YOU HAVE SEEN NOTHING YET PEOPLE

                                              {"commentId":3452757,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"seapro2007"}
                                                Reply#16 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":3452818,"authorDomain":"CSALT54"}

                                                Where in the hell do these a-holes think that they will get all this money ? Oh I remember we can print it -- hmmmm seems like a good idea -- maybe we should all just print money when we can't meet our obligations, pay our bills, want a new car, want to buy a bank so I can become KING, PRESIDENT, BUY SOME VOTES -- did I say that  --  Makes great sense especially for this group of morons in the story -- VOTE INDEPENDENT 

                                                {"commentId":3452818,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"CSALT54"}
                                                • 1 vote
                                                #16.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:17 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":3452953,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                                CSAL -

                                                It is the bail out money that has already been authorized put to a use

                                                {"commentId":3452953,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                                  #16.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:30 PM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":3453054,"authorDomain":"seapro2007"}

                                                  TexMan
                                                           would you buy one of there homes that had 10,000 dollars in back taxes,(like buying a automobile)there credit was so horrible they rolled closing and down payment into the loan,DO YOU THINK THE GOVERMENT ARE THE BANKS WILL EAT THIS EXTRA NO THEY WANT,THATS WHY I DIDINT BUY THESE SUB-PRIMES AND SIT ON IT UNTIL THE MARKET CAME BACK,THESES HOUSES ARE WORTHLESS

                                                  {"commentId":3453054,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"seapro2007"}
                                                    #16.3 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:41 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":3453708,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                                    Not worthless.   But certainly not worth the loan value.

                                                    Rather than let them sit there empty with the former owners living with relatives, in an apartment or in a shelter if job has been lost why not finance the REAL value of the house at an interst rate that does not double in two years and which can be repaid.

                                                    If you are aftair that the home owner might sell and make a profit if the economy gets better require repayment of the write down amount if the home is sold in  "X" number of years.

                                                    I do not care whose fault it was, loans including home equity loans should not have been made to people who were able to make the payment at the time the loan was made and then became unable to make the payment because the interest rate went up and caused the payment to go up to an amount that the borrower could not pay.

                                                    You might not like my solution but the alternative may be to let the Chineese ande Arabs come in and buy they up.  If that happens more than it already is all will be lost.

                                                    Sorry, but it is just that bad

                                                    {"commentId":3453708,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                                      #16.4 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:38 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":3457296,"authorDomain":"chaz7771"}

                                                      what about all the creative financing that came about like interest only loans with a balloon payment in 10 yrs. it sure made your payments lower but what happens at the end of the loan and people can't refinance? there are a hell of alot of people that took advantage of that financing and when the ballon is due they are screwed(thank god i didn't)this bailout will not help them at all. so in a few yrs when these ballons start becoming due the banks and mortage companies will be in the same prediciment they are in now. nomatter what congress does now will not cure the problem,only time and the end to bad ceo's who collect massive salarys will help end this crisis. oh wait a minute that won't work either because we will still have all the crooks in the government.

                                                      {"commentId":3457296,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"chaz7771"}
                                                        #16.5 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:48 AM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":3452788,"authorDomain":"kezzerdrix"}

                                                        what really needs to be done is capping the salaries, of these moron investors, and all the rest to boot. Cap salaries, so joe freakin shmoe instead of clearing millions a year, to $100,000 a year tops, regulate company income to disburse it more umong the employee's who without that company would not be in buisness in the 1st place. Really people....who in the heck needs  millions, so they can not only run a company into the dirt, but get millions more when they fail? Hell, if anyone can do that, i can. The pres. of the USA makes what....100k per year?....why in the name of god, should anyone take more in than him?
                                                         Profit shareing in a company, will not only ease up the pressure of p-on's like ourselves, but it also makes way for more compitition, for quality, but it actually eases the burden of stocks going belly up like a goldfish dumped into boiling water. The company has the funds it needs, cause they are not dumping it into some fool's pocket to do what? Ya grant it, say a large company whose profits rely on production, the owner needs their share, but how dang rich does one need to be for crying out loud! GM, FORD, Chrysler....how much money do they pull in per year....and how much did they spend on keeping up with "tooling"( that almost made me die laughing). Perhaps the ceo's instead of blowing all the cash the company made, someone shoulda said hey.....ummmm we need to do this"? Not a one. Now how much money are WE giving them for tooling costs ect? Well golly, why are they all of a sudden closing more plants, selling out ect?   Yup....chalk up 50 billion for some good work there. Enjoy fellow taxpayors, the dry deal we all just got.  Meanwhile, here i got laid off from work, there's a line at every place i've gone to apply thus far, and where is the government to bail me out? My landlord can't get a loan for upkeep on his buildings, where is the government helping him? BUT a freinds wife, who he just married, from ANOTHER country, can waltz right in the bank, and get a house loan, without her husband present, and without a job. yup true as the sun will shine in the morning. I think we all might be better off bailing out of the country, and re-applying for citizenship, if thats the way it works, cause somehow, its just wrong!

                                                        {"commentId":3452788,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"kezzerdrix"}
                                                          Reply#17 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":3456343,"authorDomain":"bohdansz"}

                                                          I agree  that  the  salaries  of  the  CEO's  who  exported the  American  tax  base  and  jobs  to  China  should  be confiscated!  They  are  criminals,  running  a  criminal  enterprise  of  bankrupting  America!  They  do  it because  they  only  recognize  Wall Street  economy,  not  Main Street! They  do  it  under  the  pretext  that  this  is  Capitalism! Mentira!  Capitalism  was  meant  to  serve all the  people! They cannot get  away  with  their  treasonous agenda!

                                                          {"commentId":3456343,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"bohdansz"}
                                                            #17.1 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:01 AM EDT
                                                            Reply
                                                            {"commentId":3452792,"authorDomain":"diamondb"}

                                                            The REAL problem is CREDIT CARDS..   Everyone is REsponsible.    America was issued a credit card and Americans think they can go anywhere and use it.....they really do.   They get a credit card with 5.0% interest; however, when they abuse it or overuse it; and cant make the payments ON TIME per the contract; the interest goes to 30% (legal in most states).

                                                            The American people....democrats and republicans are responsible.   In addition; families with $50,000 annual income;   man wife and two kids.... were able to finance a $400,000 home, and two cars with NO down payments; and have a pocket full of credit cards...and the next thing they know...their annual payments not counting income fed and state taxes....are more than $50,000 per year.     Voodoo economics.....One blogger said he had an economics degree.....this is NOT economics....it is stupidity......   2 + 2 = 4      always did....   We need people to live within their means; and we need government to pay close attention.   WE have people in congress...dems and repubs...that are all STUPID.....they think the American dream is     go go     Bull crap....   if you make $500 per week; you cannot spend $1000 per week.    Burn the credit cards....live right.

                                                            {"commentId":3452792,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"diamondb"}
                                                              Reply#18 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":3452823,"authorDomain":"ww365"}

                                                              Why not....The dems did their job by planting the seed of socialism.....And now that Busch is trying to anything he can to go out on a good note. Why note buy the stocks...I would advise everyone who really believes what The UNITED STATES of AMERICA stood for to out and buy your own stars and bars.....It may become a collector's item someday worth lots of money...especially if NOBAMA is elected. Hello socialism!

                                                              {"commentId":3452823,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"ww365"}
                                                                Reply#19 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:17 PM EDT
                                                                {"commentId":3452917,"authorDomain":"seapro2007"}

                                                                this is another reason your seeing the meltdown,on WallStreet there scared to death of Obama,remember there is one thing wallstreet doesnt like its UNCERTANY,if you go back this market has sold off ever since he got the Democratic Nomnation,and yes BWIII YOUR RIGHT THEY DONT LIKE SOCIALISM ON WALL STREET

                                                                {"commentId":3452917,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"seapro2007"}
                                                                  #19.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:26 PM EDT
                                                                  {"commentId":3453220,"authorDomain":"rahm"}

                                                                  BWIII:  No, it is not Socialism.  Socialism would be sharing the wealth with ALL...from bottom to top.

                                                                  Fascism is what America has been consumed by: continuing nationalism, controlled media, support of the rich at the expense of all others, military supremacy, supressed labor, corporate power protected, fraudulent elections, etc., etc.

                                                                  I'd bet there would be a lot of folks at the bottom of the economic ladder that wouldn't mind trying something new... 

                                                                  {"commentId":3453220,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"rahm"}
                                                                    #19.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:57 PM EDT
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    {"commentId":3452825,"authorDomain":"seapro2007"}

                                                                    IS what makes me sick,no one will go to prison over this,Enron was brought down for one reason,they thought they could tie George Bush to some of the misdealing(no im no bush supporter and didnt vote for him)put Barney Franks Skillings pelosi,and any other elected offcial in jail that let this happen,there all to blame,

                                                                    {"commentId":3452825,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"seapro2007"}
                                                                      Reply#20 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:18 PM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":3452871,"authorDomain":"ww365"}

                                                                      If NOBAMA gets elected this whole issue will be hushed away on his orders.....Why don't you think this isn't going anywhere now??? It ties NOBAMA directly to his thugs at ACORN and alll the criminal(in my opinion) activities they've been involved in.

                                                                      Nobody is goint to jail for any of this. If anyone does that person will be well compensated by the dems for taking the fall!

                                                                      {"commentId":3452871,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"ww365"}
                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                      #20.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:22 PM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":3453750,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                                                      BWII -

                                                                      That is another discussion.

                                                                      WHY DONT YOU SET OUT SOME FORM OF PROPOSAL HERE THAT YOU THINK WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM RATHER TO MAKE IDLE RANTS ABOUT OOBAMA AND DEMOCRATS.  (AND I AM TALKING ABOUT A PROPOSAL RELATING THIS PROBMEN ...   NOT JUST A BARE PLEA TO JUMP ON THE MCCAIN EXPRESS)

                                                                      {"commentId":3453750,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                                                        #20.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:42 PM EDT
                                                                        {"commentId":3454364,"authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}

                                                                        Well, there is a book out about arresting President Bush; difficult to do not the greatest read...the Economies section in "Uncompromising Truth for a Compromised World" is short and sweet and to the point!

                                                                        {"commentId":3454364,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"angieandhunter"}
                                                                          #20.3 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:42 PM EDT
                                                                          {"commentId":3456394,"authorDomain":"bohdansz"}

                                                                          Our  Capitalist  system  needs  quick and  thorough revamping in  the  area  of  politics,  economy  and  education. The current   Congress  only  works  in  theory:  the  rest  is  perks  and  vacations.  We  may  need  a  parallel People's  Congress -  a  Congress  that  serves  all  people! It's not socialism: it's common sense stemming from grave urgency! In  the  area  of  economy,  we  need  a  similar  People's  Comptroller Entity - an  entity  that  protects  the  Main  Street.   Insofar education,  we  need  a parallel  People's  Education  Ministry,  which puts  the  Nation  first ... before liberal  agendas!  These  "check-and-balance" institutions  should  be  set  up without  delay  or  we  will  lose  America! 

                                                                          {"commentId":3456394,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"bohdansz"}
                                                                            #20.4 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            {"commentId":3452858,"authorDomain":"dmac225"}

                                                                            I originally wrote: "Just look at the membership lists of the Council on Foreign Relations the Security and Prosperity Partnership and the Trilateral Commission." complete with links to each organizations website. Those links and part of my post did not appear. You can visit those websites by putting www in front and dot org behind cfr, spp and trilateral.

                                                                            {"commentId":3452858,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"dmac225"}
                                                                              Reply#21 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:21 PM EDT
                                                                              {"commentId":3452866,"authorDomain":"diamondb"}

                                                                              Government is not to blame totally; it is the issuers of Credit Cards..   They issue credit cards with 5% interest; and people cannot make the payments, then the interest accelerates to 20-30% and now they cant even pay the interest...   Americans are stuck on Credit cards; use them everywhere all the time.....  like free money ????    Lets take the blame and stop blaming the Gove    and the stupid politicians....   Most politicians are so dumb they cannot even think for themselves; they read polls to tell them what they are doing and how to do things...    All politicos are idiots..   Vote all the encombents OUT.

                                                                              {"commentId":3452866,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"diamondb"}
                                                                                Reply#22 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:21 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":3452935,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                                                                If you come up on a terrible car wreck caused by a drunk driver are you going to stand around and talk about how bad drunk drivers are and then discuss whether it is the distillers fault or the fault of the bar owner while the innocent people involved lie dying in their car or are you going to first save them.

                                                                                Looks like this bunch stands around and talks about how bad the drunk driver is and lets the patient die.

                                                                                {"commentId":3452935,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                                                                  Reply#23 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":3453033,"authorDomain":"scleslie"}

                                                                                  That would be true if this was an accident, but this hi-jacking of america is no accident. This fiasco was created by the same people that bailed out Wallstreet with american tax payer money, and created by the same people that are receiving the bailout money.

                                                                                  Let them die at the scene of their greed.

                                                                                  {"commentId":3453033,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"scleslie"}
                                                                                    #23.1 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:40 PM EDT
                                                                                    {"commentId":3453088,"authorDomain":"billsthename"}

                                                                                    Sheep -

                                                                                    You and similaryly situated Americans are the patient in the analogy.

                                                                                    {"commentId":3453088,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"billsthename"}
                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                    #23.2 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:44 PM EDT
                                                                                    {"commentId":3460010,"authorDomain":"widemoto"}

                                                                                    Yes, we are the patients and the doctor wants to let us bleed to death financially to save the "blood banks."

                                                                                    {"commentId":3460010,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"widemoto"}
                                                                                      #23.3 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
                                                                                      Reply
                                                                                      {"commentId":3452974,"authorDomain":"kezzerdrix"}

                                                                                      For all of those who think all , ALL of this, is because of who got a house and who didnt......guess again, there's a bit more to it than that. Condo's poppin up like weeds, and going for god-like amounts. INVESTORS, makeing the condo's, and cul-desack communities, and buying up FORCLOSED homes, and not being able to fill them. It isnt ALL because they were giving low-0 money down, its who was, and wasnt paying. It was the REALITORS, AND INVESTORS, wanting to make double-triple profit off people, and jacking the prices up. As far as the houseing market goes, they brought all that on themselves, and i feel no sorrow for those of you in the least. I'm personally happy, the gold digging flip-flop morgage companies, investors, and between got the smack-down, cause they brought it on themselves, with the bankers, ect. and if anyone of them would like so much a can of yam's(i hate yams), i'd let them starve, and eat it right in front of them. Cold? Heartless?.....well how bout those people they jacked around, and drove the market to what it did?   o well....dont look 4 comfort from me, or anyone that 1 bit of good knowlege what happend.

                                                                                      {"commentId":3452974,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"kezzerdrix"}
                                                                                        Reply#24 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:32 PM EDT
                                                                                        {"commentId":3453005,"authorDomain":"seapro2007"}

                                                                                        Do any of you in here know how much Americans took out of Home Equity loans in the 2nd quarter of 2003,try 1 billion people,to pay off debt,you would have to have a hell of a income to make a mortage plus a home equity loan,considering you have to have 80% equity,80% means your house is almost paid off,but this 1 billion should have been a wake up call to our leaders,but hey when you have the Chinese buying dollars(this is were all this zero intrest came from)Americans just got consumed into debt,buttttttttttttttttttttttt as long as the dollar stays strong there is hope,but if it ever TANKS GOD HAVE MERCY ON THIS COUNTRY

                                                                                        {"commentId":3453005,"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371","authorDomain":"seapro2007"}
                                                                                          Reply#25 - Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
                                                                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                                          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"386794","isPrivate":false}
                                                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                          {"threadId":"386794","contentId":"1990371"}
                                                                                          Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                                          Stop TrackingStop Tracking